HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1) vs Radeon R5 330 OEM

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 1 Sep 2015
HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
Radeon R5 330 OEM
Memory: 2048Mb DDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 5 May 2015
Radeon R5 330 OEM

Summary

Reasons to consider HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)

Reasons to consider Radeon R5 330 OEM

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty)
Supports Mantle
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications

Radeon R5 330 OEM

HWBench recommends Radeon R5 330 OEM

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)Radeon R5 330 OEM
GPU NameSkylake GT1 ()vsOland ()
Fab Process14 nmvs28 nm
Die Size49 mm²vs90 mm²
Transistors189 millionvs1,040 million
Shaders96vs320
Compute Units0vs5
Core clock300 MHzvs830 MHz
ROPs3vs8
TMUs12vs20

Memory Configuration

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)Radeon R5 330 OEM
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsDDR3
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs128 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs900 MHz
1800 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs2048 Mb

Additional details

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)Radeon R5 330 OEM
TDP15 wattsvs50 watts
Release Date1 Sep 2015vs5 May 2015

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.90 GP/s
  • Radeon R5 330 OEM
    6.64 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    3.60 GT/s
  • Radeon R5 330 OEM
    16.60 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.00 GB/s
  • Radeon R5 330 OEM
    28.80 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    57.60 GFLOPs
  • Radeon R5 330 OEM
    531.20 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better