HD Graphics 530 (Skylake GT2) vs GeForce GT 340 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 530 (Skylake GT2) |
| 54 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 340 OEM . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 340 OEM |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GT 340 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics 530 (Skylake GT2) | | GeForce GT 340 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Skylake GT2 () | vs | GT215 (GT215-301-A3) |
| Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 49 mm² | vs | 144 mm² |
| Transistors | 189 million | vs | 727 million |
| Shaders | 192 | vs | 96 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 4 |
| Core clock | 300 MHz | vs | 550 MHz |
| ROPs | 3 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | vs | 32 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics 530 (Skylake GT2) | | GeForce GT 340 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 850 MHz
1700 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics 530 (Skylake GT2) | | GeForce GT 340 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 69 watts |
| Release Date | 1 Sep 2015 | vs | 2 Feb 2010 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better