HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) vs HD Graphics 5500 (Broadwell GT2)
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 5500 (Broadwell GT2) |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
HWBench recommends HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD)
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) | | HD Graphics 5500 (Broadwell GT2) | |
---|
GPU Name | Arrandale () | vs | Broadwell GT2 () |
Fab Process | 45 nm | vs | 14 nm |
Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 49 mm² |
Transistors | 177 million | vs | 189 million |
Shaders | 12 | vs | 24 |
Compute Units | 0 | vs | 0 |
Core clock | 166 MHz | vs | 100 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 1 |
TMUs | 4 | vs | 4 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) | | HD Graphics 5500 (Broadwell GT2) | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) | | HD Graphics 5500 (Broadwell GT2) | |
---|
TDP | 35 watts | vs | 15 watts |
Release Date | 10 Jan 2010 | vs | 5 Sep 2014 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better