HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) vs HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Reasons to consider HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
HWBench recommends HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD)
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) | | HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Arrandale () | vs | Bay Trail GT1 () |
| Fab Process | 45 nm | vs | 22 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 177 mm² |
| Transistors | 177 million | vs | 392 million |
| Shaders | 12 | vs | 4 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 0 |
| Core clock | 166 MHz | vs | 350 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 2 |
| TMUs | 4 | vs | 2 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) | | HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) | | HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | |
|---|
| TDP | 35 watts | vs | 4 watts |
| Release Date | 10 Jan 2010 | vs | 2 Sep 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better