HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) vs HD Graphics (Haswell GT1)
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) |
Reasons to consider HD Graphics (Haswell GT1) |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
HWBench recommends HD Graphics (Haswell GT1)
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) | | HD Graphics (Haswell GT1) | |
---|
GPU Name | Arrandale () | vs | Haswell GT1 () |
Fab Process | 45 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 177 mm² |
Transistors | 177 million | vs | 392 million |
Shaders | 12 | vs | 10 |
Compute Units | 0 | vs | 0 |
Core clock | 166 MHz | vs | 350 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 2 |
TMUs | 4 | vs | 2 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) | | HD Graphics (Haswell GT1) | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) | | HD Graphics (Haswell GT1) | |
---|
TDP | 35 watts | vs | 45 watts |
Release Date | 10 Jan 2010 | vs | 29 Apr 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better