HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) vs Radeon Pro Duo
Summary
Reasons to consider HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) |
| 315 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon Pro Duo . |
Reasons to consider Radeon Pro Duo |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon Pro Duo
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) | | Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Arrandale () | vs | Capsaicin (Capsaicin XT) |
| Fab Process | 45 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 596 mm² |
| Transistors | 177 million | vs | 8,900 million |
| Shaders | 12 | vs | 4096 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 64 |
| Core clock | 166 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 64 |
| TMUs | 4 | vs | 256 |
Memory Configuration
| HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) | | Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | HBM |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 4096 bit x2 |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 500 MHz
1000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| HD Graphics (Arrandale GMA HD) | | Radeon Pro Duo | |
|---|
| TDP | 35 watts | vs | 350 watts |
| Release Date | 10 Jan 2010 | vs | 14 Mar 2016 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better