HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) vs HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)

HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 2 Sep 2013
HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 1 Sep 2015
HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)

Summary

Reasons to consider HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)

Reasons to consider HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)

This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.

HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)

HWBench recommends HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
GPU NameBay Trail GT1 ()vsSkylake GT1 ()
Fab Process22 nmvs14 nm
Die Size177 mm²vs49 mm²
Transistors392 millionvs189 million
Shaders4vs96
Compute Units0vs0
Core clock350 MHzvs300 MHz
ROPs2vs3
TMUs2vs12

Memory Configuration

HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsSystem Shared
Bus WidthSystem SharedvsSystem Shared
Memory SpeedSystem SharedvsSystem Shared
Memory Size0 Mbvs0 Mb

Additional details

HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
TDP4 wattsvs15 watts
Release Date2 Sep 2013vs1 Sep 2015

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
    0.70 GP/s
  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.90 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
    0.70 GT/s
  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    3.60 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
    0.00 GB/s
  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    0.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
    2.80 GFLOPs
  • HD Graphics 510 (Skylake GT1)
    57.60 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better