Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 460
Summary
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
115 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 460 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 460 |
Supports PhysX |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 460 | |
---|
GPU Name | Haswell GT3e () | vs | GF104 (GF104-300-KB-A1) |
Fab Process | 22 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 177 mm² | vs | 332 mm² |
Transistors | 392 million | vs | 1,950 million |
Shaders | 40 | vs | 336 |
Compute Units | 0 | vs | 7 |
Core clock | 200 MHz | vs | 675 MHz |
ROPs | 2 | vs | 32 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 56 |
Memory Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 460 | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 900 MHz
3600 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 460 | |
---|
TDP | 45 watts | vs | 160 watts |
Release Date | 3 Jun 2013 | vs | 12 Jul 2010 |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
10.40 GP/s
GeForce GTX 460
9.45 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
20.80 GT/s
GeForce GTX 460
37.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 460
115.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
832.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 460
907.20 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better