Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 650
Summary
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 650 |
| Supports PhysX |
| Supports G-Sync |
| Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Haswell GT3e () | vs | GK106 () |
| Fab Process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 177 mm² | vs | 221 mm² |
| Transistors | 392 million | vs | 2,540 million |
| Shaders | 40 | vs | 384 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 200 MHz | vs | 1058 MHz |
| ROPs | 2 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 32 |
Memory Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1250 MHz
5000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 650 | |
|---|
| TDP | 45 watts | vs | 65 watts |
| Release Date | 3 Jun 2013 | vs | 27 Nov 2013 |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
10.40 GP/s
GeForce GTX 650
8.46 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
20.80 GT/s
GeForce GTX 650
33.90 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 650
80.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
832.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 650
812.50 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better