Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Summary
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
205 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 980 Ti . |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|
GPU Name | Haswell GT3e () | vs | GM200 (GM200-310-A1) |
Fab Process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 177 mm² | vs | 601 mm² |
Transistors | 392 million | vs | 8,000 million |
Shaders | 40 | vs | 2816 |
Compute Units | 0 | vs | 22 |
Core clock | 200 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
ROPs | 2 | vs | 96 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 176 |
Memory Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 384 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1753 MHz
7012 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 6144 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | |
---|
TDP | 45 watts | vs | 250 watts |
Release Date | 3 Jun 2013 | vs | 2 Jun 2015 |
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
10.40 GP/s
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
96.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
20.80 GT/s
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
176.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
0.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
337.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
832.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
5632.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better