Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2)
Summary
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Reasons to consider HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2) |
HWBench recommends Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2) | |
---|
GPU Name | Haswell GT3e () | vs | Haswell GT2 () |
Fab Process | 22 nm | vs | 22 nm |
Die Size | 177 mm² | vs | 177 mm² |
Transistors | 392 million | vs | 392 million |
Shaders | 40 | vs | 20 |
Compute Units | 0 | vs | 0 |
Core clock | 200 MHz | vs | 400 MHz |
ROPs | 2 | vs | 2 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 4 |
Memory Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2) | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | | HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell GT2) | |
---|
TDP | 45 watts | vs | 45 watts |
Release Date | 3 Jun 2013 | vs | 3 Jun 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better