Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310)
Summary
Reasons to consider Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
Reasons to consider Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Broadwell GT3e () | vs | Mullins () |
| Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 49 mm² | vs | 0 mm² |
| Transistors | 189 million | vs | unknown |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 128 |
| Compute Units | 0 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 300 MHz | vs | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 6 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 48 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | System Shared |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 0 Mb |
Additional details
| Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | | Radeon R4 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6310) | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 15 watts |
| Release Date | 5 Sep 2014 | vs | 11 Jun 2014 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better