Radeon E9260 MXM vs Radeon R9 M270X
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon E9260 MXM |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 M270X |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon E9260 MXM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon E9260 MXM | | Radeon R9 M270X | |
---|
GPU Name | Baffin (Baffin PRO) | vs | Venus (Venus XT) |
Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 123 mm² | vs | 123 mm² |
Transistors | 3,000 million | vs | 1,500 million |
Shaders | 896 | vs | 640 |
Compute Units | 14 | vs | 10 |
Core clock | 1090 MHz | vs | 725 MHz |
ROPs | 16 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 48 | vs | 40 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon E9260 MXM | | Radeon R9 M270X | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 1750 MHz
7000 MHz effective | vs | 1000 MHz
4000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon E9260 MXM | | Radeon R9 M270X | |
---|
TDP | 50 watts | vs | 0 watts |
Release Date | 27 Sep 2016 | vs | 21 Mar 2014 |
Radeon E9260 MXM
19.20 GP/s
Radeon R9 M270X
12.40 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon E9260 MXM
57.60 GT/s
Radeon R9 M270X
31.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon E9260 MXM
112.00 GB/s
Radeon R9 M270X
64.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon E9260 MXM
2150.40 GFLOPs
Radeon R9 M270X
992.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better