Radeon E9550 MXM vs Radeon R9 M385X
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon E9550 MXM |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 M385X |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon E9550 MXM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon E9550 MXM | | Radeon R9 M385X | |
---|
GPU Name | Ellesmere (Ellesmere XT) | vs | Strato (Strato XT) |
Fab Process | 14 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 232 mm² | vs | 160 mm² |
Transistors | 5,700 million | vs | 2,080 million |
Shaders | 2304 | vs | 896 |
Compute Units | 36 | vs | 14 |
Core clock | 1120 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
ROPs | 32 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 144 | vs | 56 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon E9550 MXM | | Radeon R9 M385X | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 2000 MHz
8000 MHz effective | vs | 1200 MHz
4800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 8192 Mb | vs | 4096 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon E9550 MXM | | Radeon R9 M385X | |
---|
TDP | 95 watts | vs | 0 watts |
Release Date | 27 Sep 2016 | vs | 5 May 2015 |
Radeon E9550 MXM
40.50 GP/s
Radeon R9 M385X
17.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon E9550 MXM
182.30 GT/s
Radeon R9 M385X
61.60 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon E9550 MXM
256.00 GB/s
Radeon R9 M385X
76.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon E9550 MXM
5834.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R9 M385X
1971.20 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better