Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition |
85 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 660 OEM . |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 660 OEM |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Kepler), there are less performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition | | GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
---|
GPU Name | RV630 () | vs | GK104 (GK104-200-KD-A2) |
Fab Process | 65 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 153 mm² | vs | 294 mm² |
Transistors | 390 million | vs | 3,540 million |
Shaders | 120 | vs | 1152 |
Compute Units | 3 | vs | 6 |
Core clock | 700 MHz | vs | 823 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 24 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 96 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition | | GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 192 bit |
Memory Speed | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective | vs | 1400 MHz
5600 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 256 Mb | vs | 1536 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition | | GeForce GTX 660 OEM | |
---|
TDP | 45 watts | vs | 130 watts |
Release Date | 21 Feb 2008 | vs | 22 Aug 2012 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better