Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 6930
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition |
| 141 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 6930 . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6930 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6930
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6930 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | RV630 () | vs | Cayman (Cayman CE) |
| Fab Process | 65 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 153 mm² | vs | 389 mm² |
| Transistors | 390 million | vs | 2,640 million |
| Shaders | 120 | vs | 1280 |
| Compute Units | 3 | vs | 20 |
| Core clock | 700 MHz | vs | 750 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 32 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 80 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6930 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective | vs | 1200 MHz
4800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 256 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6930 | |
|---|
| TDP | 45 watts | vs | 186 watts |
| Release Date | 21 Feb 2008 | vs | 1 Dec 2011 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better