Radeon HD 3570 vs Radeon HD 6250
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 3570 |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6250 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6250
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 3570 | | Radeon HD 6250 | |
---|
GPU Name | RV620 (RV620 PRO) | vs | Cedar (Cedar PRO) |
Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 67 mm² | vs | 59 mm² |
Transistors | 181 million | vs | 292 million |
Shaders | 40 | vs | 80 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 796 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 4 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 3570 | | Radeon HD 6250 | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | GDDR3 |
Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 495 MHz
990 MHz effective | vs | 500 MHz
1000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 3570 | | Radeon HD 6250 | |
---|
TDP | 30 watts | vs | 19 watts |
Release Date | 5 Jul 2010 | vs | 31 Jan 2011 |
Radeon HD 3570
3.18 GP/s
Radeon HD 6250
2.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 3570
3.18 GT/s
Radeon HD 6250
5.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 3570
7.92 GB/s
Radeon HD 6250
8.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 3570
63.68 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 6250
104.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better