Radeon HD 3650 vs GeForce GTS 250
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 3650 |
| 85 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTS 250 . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 250 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTS 250
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 3650 | | GeForce GTS 250 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | RV635 (RV635 PRO) | vs | G92B (G92-428-B1) |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 135 mm² | vs | 260 mm² |
| Transistors | 378 million | vs | 754 million |
| Shaders | 120 | vs | 128 |
| Compute Units | 3 | vs | 8 |
| Core clock | 725 MHz | vs | 702 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 3650 | | GeForce GTS 250 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR3 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective | vs | 1000 MHz
2000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 256 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 3650 | | GeForce GTS 250 | |
|---|
| TDP | 65 watts | vs | 150 watts |
| Release Date | 20 Jan 2008 | vs | 4 Mar 2009 |
Radeon HD 3650
2.90 GP/s
GeForce GTS 250
11.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 3650
5.80 GT/s
GeForce GTS 250
44.90 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 3650
25.60 GB/s
GeForce GTS 250
64.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 3650
174.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTS 250
387.10 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better