Radeon HD 4350 PCI vs GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4350 PCI |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 4350 PCI
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 4350 PCI | | GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| GPU Name | RV710 () | vs | G96C () |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 73 mm² | vs | 121 mm² |
| Transistors | 242 million | vs | 314 million |
| Shaders | 80 | vs | 32 |
| Compute Units | 1 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 600 MHz | vs | 550 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 16 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 4350 PCI | | GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective | vs | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 4350 PCI | | GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| TDP | 20 watts | vs | 50 watts |
| Release Date | 30 Sep 2008 | vs | 20 Jan 2009 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better