Radeon HD 4350 vs GeForce GTX 285
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4350 |
| 184 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 285 . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 285 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 285
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 4350 | | GeForce GTX 285 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | RV710 () | vs | GT200B (G200-350-B3) |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 73 mm² | vs | 470 mm² |
| Transistors | 242 million | vs | 1,400 million |
| Shaders | 80 | vs | 240 |
| Compute Units | 1 | vs | 10 |
| Core clock | 600 MHz | vs | 648 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 32 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 80 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 4350 | | GeForce GTX 285 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 512 bit |
| Memory Speed | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective | vs | 1242 MHz
2484 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 4350 | | GeForce GTX 285 | |
|---|
| TDP | 20 watts | vs | 204 watts |
| Release Date | 30 Sep 2008 | vs | 23 Dec 2008 |
Radeon HD 4350
2.40 GP/s
GeForce GTX 285
20.70 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 4350
4.80 GT/s
GeForce GTX 285
51.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 4350
6.40 GB/s
GeForce GTX 285
159.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 4350
96.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 285
708.50 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better