Radeon HD 4750 vs GeForce GTX 295
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4750 |
| 189 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 295 . |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 295 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 4750 | | GeForce GTX 295 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | RV740 (RV740 PRO) | vs | GT200B (G200-400-B3) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 137 mm² | vs | 470 mm² |
| Transistors | 826 million | vs | 1,400 million |
| Shaders | 640 | vs | 240 |
| Compute Units | 8 | vs | 10 |
| Core clock | 730 MHz | vs | 576 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 28 |
| TMUs | 32 | vs | 80 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 4750 | | GeForce GTX 295 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 448 bit x2 |
| Memory Speed | 800 MHz
3200 MHz effective | vs | 999 MHz
1998 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 896 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 4750 | | GeForce GTX 295 | |
|---|
| TDP | 100 watts | vs | 289 watts |
| Release Date | 9 Sep 2009 | vs | 8 Jan 2009 |
Radeon HD 4750
11.70 GP/s
GeForce GTX 295
32.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 4750
23.40 GT/s
GeForce GTX 295
92.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 4750
51.20 GB/s
GeForce GTX 295
224.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 4750
934.40 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX 295
1192.40 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better