Radeon HD 4860 vs GeForce GTS 250
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4860 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTS 250 |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 4860
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 4860 | | GeForce GTS 250 | |
---|
GPU Name | RV790 (RV790 GT) | vs | G92B (G92-428-B1) |
Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 55 nm |
Die Size | 282 mm² | vs | 260 mm² |
Transistors | 959 million | vs | 754 million |
Shaders | 640 | vs | 128 |
Compute Units | 8 | vs | 8 |
Core clock | 700 MHz | vs | 702 MHz |
ROPs | 16 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 32 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 4860 | | GeForce GTS 250 | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR3 |
Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | 750 MHz
3000 MHz effective | vs | 1000 MHz
2000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 4860 | | GeForce GTS 250 | |
---|
TDP | 130 watts | vs | 150 watts |
Release Date | 9 Sep 2009 | vs | 4 Mar 2009 |
Radeon HD 4860
11.20 GP/s
GeForce GTS 250
11.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 4860
22.40 GT/s
GeForce GTS 250
44.90 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 4860
96.00 GB/s
GeForce GTS 250
64.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 4860
896.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GTS 250
387.10 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better