Radeon HD 4890 vs Radeon HD 7510 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4890 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 7510 OEM |
| 151 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 4890 . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 4890
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 4890 | | Radeon HD 7510 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | RV790 (RV790 XT) | vs | Turks (Turks LE) |
| Fab Process | 55 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 282 mm² | vs | 118 mm² |
| Transistors | 959 million | vs | 716 million |
| Shaders | 800 | vs | 320 |
| Compute Units | 10 | vs | 4 |
| Core clock | 850 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 40 | vs | 16 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 4890 | | Radeon HD 7510 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 975 MHz
3900 MHz effective | vs | 667 MHz
1334 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 4890 | | Radeon HD 7510 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 190 watts | vs | 39 watts |
| Release Date | 2 Apr 2009 | vs | 1 Feb 2013 |
Radeon HD 4890
13.60 GP/s
Radeon HD 7510 OEM
2.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 4890
34.00 GT/s
Radeon HD 7510 OEM
10.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 4890
125.00 GB/s
Radeon HD 7510 OEM
21.30 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 4890
1360.00 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 7510 OEM
416.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better