Radeon HD 5450 vs GeForce 510 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 5450 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce 510 OEM |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 5450 | | GeForce 510 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Cedar (Cedar PRO) | vs | GF119 () |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 59 mm² | vs | 79 mm² |
| Transistors | 292 million | vs | 292 million |
| Shaders | 80 | vs | 48 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 1 |
| Core clock | 650 MHz | vs | 523 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 5450 | | GeForce 510 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective | vs | 898 MHz
1796 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 5450 | | GeForce 510 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 19 watts | vs | 25 watts |
| Release Date | 4 Feb 2010 | vs | 29 Sep 2011 |
Radeon HD 5450
2.60 GP/s
GeForce 510 OEM
1.05 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 5450
5.20 GT/s
GeForce 510 OEM
4.18 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 5450
6.40 GB/s
GeForce 510 OEM
14.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 5450
104.00 GFLOPs
GeForce 510 OEM
100.40 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better