Radeon HD 5450 vs GeForce GT 420 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 5450 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 420 OEM |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports PhysX |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Fermi), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GT 420 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 5450 | | GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Cedar (Cedar PRO) | vs | GF108 (GF108-200-A1) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 59 mm² | vs | 116 mm² |
| Transistors | 292 million | vs | 585 million |
| Shaders | 80 | vs | 48 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 1 |
| Core clock | 650 MHz | vs | 700 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 4 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 5450 | | GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR2 | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 1048 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 5450 | | GeForce GT 420 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 19 watts | vs | 50 watts |
| Release Date | 4 Feb 2010 | vs | 3 Sep 2010 |
Radeon HD 5450
2.60 GP/s
GeForce GT 420 OEM
1.40 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 5450
5.20 GT/s
GeForce GT 420 OEM
2.80 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 5450
6.40 GB/s
GeForce GT 420 OEM
28.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 5450
104.00 GFLOPs
GeForce GT 420 OEM
134.40 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better