Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition |
| 53 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Cypress (Cypress XT) | vs | Cypress (Cypress XT) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 334 mm² | vs | 334 mm² |
| Transistors | 2,154 million | vs | 2,154 million |
| Shaders | 1600 | vs | 1600 |
| Compute Units | 20 | vs | 20 |
| Core clock | 850 MHz | vs | 850 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | vs | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | vs | 80 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256 bit | vs | 256 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1195 MHz
4780 MHz effective | vs | 1050 MHz
4200 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6870 1600SP Edition | |
|---|
| TDP | 228 watts | vs | 175 watts |
| Release Date | 30 Jun 2010 | vs | 14 Jan 2013 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better