Radeon HD 6410D IGP vs GeForce GTX TITAN X
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6410D IGP |
185 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX TITAN X . |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX TITAN X |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports PhysX |
Supports G-Sync |
Supports ShadowPlay (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Maxwell), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends GeForce GTX TITAN X
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 6410D IGP | | GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
---|
GPU Name | WinterPark () | vs | GM200 (GM200-400-A1) |
Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 59 mm² | vs | 601 mm² |
Transistors | unknown | vs | 8,000 million |
Shaders | 160 | vs | 3072 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 24 |
Core clock | 444 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 96 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 192 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 6410D IGP | | GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 384 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1753 MHz
7012 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 12288 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 6410D IGP | | GeForce GTX TITAN X | |
---|
TDP | 65 watts | vs | 250 watts |
Release Date | 20 Jun 2011 | vs | 17 Mar 2015 |
Radeon HD 6410D IGP
1.78 GP/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
96.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 6410D IGP
3.55 GT/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
192.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 6410D IGP
0.00 GB/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
337.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 6410D IGP
142.10 GFLOPs
GeForce GTX TITAN X
6144.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better