Radeon HD 6410D IGP vs Radeon HD 8450 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6410D IGP |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8450 OEM |
| 47 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 6410D IGP . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 6410D IGP | | Radeon HD 8450 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | WinterPark () | vs | Caicos (Caicos PRO-L) |
| Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 59 mm² | vs | 67 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 370 million |
| Shaders | 160 | vs | 160 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 600 MHz | vs | 625 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 6410D IGP | | Radeon HD 8450 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 667 MHz
1334 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 6410D IGP | | Radeon HD 8450 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 65 watts | vs | 18 watts |
| Release Date | 20 Jun 2011 | vs | 8 Jan 2013 |
Radeon HD 6410D IGP
2.40 GP/s
Radeon HD 8450 OEM
2.50 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 6410D IGP
4.80 GT/s
Radeon HD 8450 OEM
5.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 6410D IGP
0.00 GB/s
Radeon HD 8450 OEM
10.70 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 6410D IGP
192.00 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 8450 OEM
200.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better