Radeon HD 6530D IGP vs GeForce 9600 GSO
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6530D IGP |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce 9600 GSO |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 6530D IGP | | GeForce 9600 GSO | |
|---|
| GPU Name | BeaverCreek () | vs | G92 () |
| Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 65 nm |
| Die Size | 228 mm² | vs | 324 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,450 million | vs | 754 million |
| Shaders | 320 | vs | 96 |
| Compute Units | 4 | vs | 6 |
| Core clock | 443 MHz | vs | 550 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 12 |
| TMUs | 16 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 6530D IGP | | GeForce 9600 GSO | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 192 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 384 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 6530D IGP | | GeForce 9600 GSO | |
|---|
| TDP | 65 watts | vs | 84 watts |
| Release Date | 20 Jun 2011 | vs | 28 Apr 2008 |
Radeon HD 6530D IGP
3.54 GP/s
GeForce 9600 GSO
6.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 6530D IGP
7.09 GT/s
GeForce 9600 GSO
26.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 6530D IGP
0.00 GB/s
GeForce 9600 GSO
38.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 6530D IGP
283.50 GFLOPs
GeForce 9600 GSO
264.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better