Radeon HD 6670 vs Radeon R7 360
Summary
Radeon HD 6670
100%
Radeon R7 360
326%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6670 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 360 |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Around 226% higher average synthetic performance. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports FreeSync |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports TrueAudio |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R7 360
The Radeon R7 360 is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 6670 | | Radeon R7 360 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Turks (Turks XT) | vs | Tobago (Tobago PRO) |
| Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 118 mm² | vs | 160 mm² |
| Transistors | 716 million | vs | 2,080 million |
| Shaders | 480 | vs | 768 |
| Compute Units | 6 | vs | 12 |
| Core clock | 800 MHz | vs | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 6670 | | Radeon R7 360 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 1000 MHz
4000 MHz effective | vs | 1500 MHz
6000 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 6670 | | Radeon R7 360 | |
|---|
| TDP | 66 watts | vs | 100 watts |
| Release Date | 19 Apr 2011 | vs | 18 Jun 2015 |
Radeon HD 6670
6.40 GP/s
Radeon R7 360
16.80 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 6670
19.20 GT/s
Radeon R7 360
50.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 6670
64.00 GB/s
Radeon R7 360
96.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 6670
768.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R7 360
1612.80 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Radeon HD 6670
1960
Radeon R7 360
6400
Points (higher is better)