Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition vs Radeon HD 6970M Mac Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition |
40 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 6970M Mac Edition . |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6970M Mac Edition |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6970M Mac Edition
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6970M Mac Edition | |
---|
GPU Name | Whistler (Whistler PRO) | vs | Blackcomb (Blackcomb XT) |
Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 104 mm² | vs | 212 mm² |
Transistors | 716 million | vs | 1,700 million |
Shaders | 480 | vs | 960 |
Compute Units | 6 | vs | 12 |
Core clock | 598 MHz | vs | 680 MHz |
ROPs | 8 | vs | 32 |
TMUs | 24 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6970M Mac Edition | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | 794 MHz
3176 MHz effective | vs | 900 MHz
3600 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 512 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 6750M Mac Edition | | Radeon HD 6970M Mac Edition | |
---|
TDP | 35 watts | vs | 75 watts |
Release Date | 18 Apr 2011 | vs | 25 Aug 2011 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better