Radeon HD 7310 IGP vs Radeon HD 6290
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 7310 IGP |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6290 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6290
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 7310 IGP | | Radeon HD 6290 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Loveland () | vs | Cedar (Cedar LE) |
| Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 75 mm² | vs | 59 mm² |
| Transistors | 75 million | vs | 292 million |
| Shaders | 80 | vs | 80 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 500 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 7310 IGP | | Radeon HD 6290 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 800 MHz
1600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 7310 IGP | | Radeon HD 6290 | |
|---|
| TDP | 18 watts | vs | 19 watts |
| Release Date | 6 Jun 2012 | vs | 4 Dec 2011 |
Radeon HD 7310 IGP
2.00 GP/s
Radeon HD 6290
2.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 7310 IGP
4.00 GT/s
Radeon HD 6290
5.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 7310 IGP
0.00 GB/s
Radeon HD 6290
12.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 7310 IGP
80.00 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 6290
104.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better