Radeon HD 8240 IGP vs Radeon HD 7950
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8240 IGP |
185 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 7950 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 7950 |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 7950
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 8240 IGP | | Radeon HD 7950 | |
---|
GPU Name | Kalindi (Kalindi LP) | vs | Tahiti (Tahiti PRO) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 110 mm² | vs | 352 mm² |
Transistors | 1,178 million | vs | 4,313 million |
Shaders | 128 | vs | 1792 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 28 |
Core clock | 400 MHz | vs | 800 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 32 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 112 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 8240 IGP | | Radeon HD 7950 | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 384 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1250 MHz
5000 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 3072 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 8240 IGP | | Radeon HD 7950 | |
---|
TDP | 15 watts | vs | 200 watts |
Release Date | 1 Nov 2013 | vs | 31 Jan 2012 |
Radeon HD 8240 IGP
1.60 GP/s
Radeon HD 7950
25.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8240 IGP
3.20 GT/s
Radeon HD 7950
89.60 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8240 IGP
0.00 GB/s
Radeon HD 7950
240.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 8240 IGP
102.40 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 7950
2867.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better