Radeon HD 8280 IGP vs Radeon HD 5750
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8280 IGP |
| 71 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 5750 . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 5750 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 5750
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 8280 IGP | | Radeon HD 5750 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Kalindi () | vs | Juniper (Juniper LE) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 110 mm² | vs | 166 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,178 million | vs | 1,040 million |
| Shaders | 128 | vs | 720 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 9 |
| Core clock | 450 MHz | vs | 700 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 16 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 36 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 8280 IGP | | Radeon HD 5750 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1150 MHz
4600 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 8280 IGP | | Radeon HD 5750 | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 86 watts |
| Release Date | 18 Sep 2013 | vs | 13 Oct 2009 |
Radeon HD 8280 IGP
1.80 GP/s
Radeon HD 5750
11.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8280 IGP
3.60 GT/s
Radeon HD 5750
25.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8280 IGP
0.00 GB/s
Radeon HD 5750
73.60 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 8280 IGP
115.20 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 5750
1008.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better