Radeon HD 8330 IGP vs GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8330 IGP |
| 60 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 8330 IGP | | GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Kalindi () | vs | G94B () |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 110 mm² | vs | 196 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,178 million | vs | 505 million |
| Shaders | 128 | vs | 48 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 3 |
| Core clock | 497 MHz | vs | 600 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 12 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 8330 IGP | | GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 192 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 792 MHz
1584 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 8330 IGP | | GeForce GT 130 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 75 watts |
| Release Date | 13 Aug 2013 | vs | 12 Dec 2008 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better