Radeon HD 8330 IGP vs GeForce GT 220
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8330 IGP |
43 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 220 . |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 220 |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 8330 IGP | | GeForce GT 220 | |
---|
GPU Name | Kalindi () | vs | G94 () |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 65 nm |
Die Size | 110 mm² | vs | 240 mm² |
Transistors | 1,178 million | vs | 505 million |
Shaders | 128 | vs | 48 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 497 MHz | vs | 600 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 8330 IGP | | GeForce GT 220 | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 256 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 700 MHz
1400 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 8330 IGP | | GeForce GT 220 | |
---|
TDP | 15 watts | vs | 58 watts |
Release Date | 13 Aug 2013 | vs | 26 Jan 2010 |
Radeon HD 8330 IGP
1.99 GP/s
GeForce GT 220
9.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8330 IGP
3.98 GT/s
GeForce GT 220
14.40 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8330 IGP
0.00 GB/s
GeForce GT 220
44.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 8330 IGP
127.20 GFLOPs
GeForce GT 220
144.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better