Radeon HD 8330 IGP vs GeForce GT 415 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8330 IGP |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce GT 415 OEM |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 8330 IGP | | GeForce GT 415 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Kalindi () | vs | GT216 (GT216-305-A3) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 110 mm² | vs | 100 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,178 million | vs | 486 million |
| Shaders | 128 | vs | 48 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 497 MHz | vs | 625 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 16 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 8330 IGP | | GeForce GT 415 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 333 MHz
666 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 8330 IGP | | GeForce GT 415 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 32 watts |
| Release Date | 13 Aug 2013 | vs | 3 Sep 2010 |
Radeon HD 8330 IGP
1.99 GP/s
GeForce GT 415 OEM
5.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8330 IGP
3.98 GT/s
GeForce GT 415 OEM
10.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8330 IGP
0.00 GB/s
GeForce GT 415 OEM
10.70 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 8330 IGP
127.20 GFLOPs
GeForce GT 415 OEM
130.60 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better