Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs Radeon R5 220 OEM

Radeon HD 8400 IGP
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 23 Nov 2013
Radeon HD 8400 IGP
Radeon R5 220 OEM
Memory: 1024Mb DDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 21 Dec 2013
Radeon R5 220 OEM

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8400 IGP

Reasons to consider Radeon R5 220 OEM

Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications

No clear winner declared

We have no data to declare a winner at this time.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon HD 8400 IGPRadeon R5 220 OEM
GPU NameKalindi ()vsCedar (Cedar PRO)
Fab Process28 nmvs40 nm
Die Size110 mm²vs59 mm²
Transistors1,178 millionvs292 million
Shaders128vs80
Compute Units2vs2
Core clock400 MHzvs650 MHz
ROPs4vs4
TMUs8vs8

Memory Configuration

Radeon HD 8400 IGPRadeon R5 220 OEM
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsDDR3
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs64 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs533 MHz
1066 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs1024 Mb

Additional details

Radeon HD 8400 IGPRadeon R5 220 OEM
TDP25 wattsvs19 watts
Release Date23 Nov 2013vs21 Dec 2013

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon HD 8400 IGP
    1.60 GP/s
  • Radeon R5 220 OEM
    2.60 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon HD 8400 IGP
    3.20 GT/s
  • Radeon R5 220 OEM
    5.20 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon HD 8400 IGP
    0.00 GB/s
  • Radeon R5 220 OEM
    8.53 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon HD 8400 IGP
    102.40 GFLOPs
  • Radeon R5 220 OEM
    104.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better