Radeon HD 8400 IGP vs Radeon R5 220 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8400 IGP |
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 220 OEM |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 8400 IGP | | Radeon R5 220 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Kalindi () | vs | Cedar (Cedar PRO) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 110 mm² | vs | 59 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,178 million | vs | 292 million |
| Shaders | 128 | vs | 80 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 400 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 8400 IGP | | Radeon R5 220 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 533 MHz
1066 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 8400 IGP | | Radeon R5 220 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 25 watts | vs | 19 watts |
| Release Date | 23 Nov 2013 | vs | 21 Dec 2013 |
Radeon HD 8400 IGP
1.60 GP/s
Radeon R5 220 OEM
2.60 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8400 IGP
3.20 GT/s
Radeon R5 220 OEM
5.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8400 IGP
0.00 GB/s
Radeon R5 220 OEM
8.53 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 8400 IGP
102.40 GFLOPs
Radeon R5 220 OEM
104.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better