Radeon HD 8650D IGP vs Radeon HD 4670 X2
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8650D IGP |
| 53 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon HD 4670 X2 . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 4670 X2 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 8650D IGP | | Radeon HD 4670 X2 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Scrapper () | vs | RV730 (RV730 XT) |
| Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 246 mm² | vs | 146 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,303 million | vs | 514 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 320 |
| Compute Units | 4 | vs | 4 |
| Core clock | 720 MHz | vs | 750 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | vs | 32 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 8650D IGP | | Radeon HD 4670 X2 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 128 bit x2 |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 700 MHz
1400 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 8650D IGP | | Radeon HD 4670 X2 | |
|---|
| TDP | 65 watts | vs | 118 watts |
| Release Date | 28 Dec 2013 | vs | 10 Sep 2008 |
Radeon HD 8650D IGP
5.76 GP/s
Radeon HD 4670 X2
12.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8650D IGP
17.30 GT/s
Radeon HD 4670 X2
48.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon HD 8650D IGP
0.00 GB/s
Radeon HD 4670 X2
44.80 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon HD 8650D IGP
553.00 GFLOPs
Radeon HD 4670 X2
960.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better