Radeon HD 8670D IGP vs GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 8670D IGP |
| 104 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon HD 8670D IGP | | GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Devastator () | vs | GT200B (G200-350-B3) |
| Fab Process | 32 nm | vs | 55 nm |
| Die Size | 246 mm² | vs | 470 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,303 million | vs | 1,400 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 240 |
| Compute Units | 6 | vs | 10 |
| Core clock | 844 MHz | vs | 648 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 32 |
| TMUs | 24 | vs | 80 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon HD 8670D IGP | | GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 512 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 1242 MHz
2484 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon HD 8670D IGP | | GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition | |
|---|
| TDP | 100 watts | vs | 204 watts |
| Release Date | 12 Mar 2013 | vs | 15 Jan 2009 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better