Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) vs Radeon HD 6350
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider Radeon HD 6350 |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon HD 6350
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) | | Radeon HD 6350 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Mullins () | vs | Cedar (Cedar PRO) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
| Die Size | 0 mm² | vs | 59 mm² |
| Transistors | unknown | vs | 292 million |
| Shaders | 128 | vs | 80 |
| Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
| Core clock | 267 MHz | vs | 650 MHz |
| ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
| TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) | | Radeon HD 6350 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 64 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R3 Graphics IGP (APU A6-6200) | | Radeon HD 6350 | |
|---|
| TDP | 15 watts | vs | 19 watts |
| Release Date | 28 Jan 2015 | vs | 7 Feb 2011 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better