Radeon R5 230 OEM vs Radeon R5 230
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 230 OEM |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 230 |
Based on an outdated architecture (ATI TeraScale), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R5 230 OEM | | Radeon R5 230 | |
---|
GPU Name | Caicos (Caicos PRO) | vs | Caicos (Caicos PRO) |
Fab Process | 40 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 67 mm² | vs | 67 mm² |
Transistors | 370 million | vs | 370 million |
Shaders | 160 | vs | 160 |
Compute Units | 2 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 625 MHz | vs | 625 MHz |
ROPs | 4 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 8 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R5 230 OEM | | Radeon R5 230 | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | 64 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 667 MHz
1334 MHz effective | vs | 667 MHz
1334 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R5 230 OEM | | Radeon R5 230 | |
---|
TDP | 19 watts | vs | 19 watts |
Release Date | 21 Dec 2013 | vs | 3 Apr 2014 |
Radeon R5 230 OEM
2.50 GP/s
Radeon R5 230
2.50 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon R5 230 OEM
5.00 GT/s
Radeon R5 230
5.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon R5 230 OEM
10.70 GB/s
Radeon R5 230
10.67 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon R5 230 OEM
200.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R5 230
200.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better