Radeon R5 Graphics IGP vs GeForce GT 230

Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 14 Jun 2014
Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
GeForce GT 230
Memory: 512Mb GDDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 12 Oct 2009
GeForce GT 230

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon R5 Graphics IGP

60 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GT 230 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.

Reasons to consider GeForce GT 230

Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor

Radeon R5 Graphics IGP

HWBench recommends Radeon R5 Graphics IGP

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon R5 Graphics IGPGeForce GT 230
GPU NameMullins ()vsG94B (G94-300-B1)
Fab Process28 nmvs55 nm
Die Size0 mm²vs196 mm²
Transistorsunknownvs505 million
Shaders128vs48
Compute Units2vs3
Core clock800 MHzvs650 MHz
ROPs4vs16
TMUs8vs24

Memory Configuration

Radeon R5 Graphics IGPGeForce GT 230
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsGDDR3
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs256 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs900 MHz
1800 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs512 Mb

Additional details

Radeon R5 Graphics IGPGeForce GT 230
TDP15 wattsvs75 watts
Release Date14 Jun 2014vs12 Oct 2009

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
    3.20 GP/s
  • GeForce GT 230
    10.40 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
    6.40 GT/s
  • GeForce GT 230
    15.60 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GT 230
    57.60 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon R5 Graphics IGP
    204.80 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GT 230
    156.00 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better