Radeon R6 Graphics IGP vs GeForce GTX 275

Radeon R6 Graphics IGP
Memory: 0Mb System SharedDESKTOP
Release date: 17 Sep 2014
Radeon R6 Graphics IGP
GeForce GTX 275
Memory: 896Mb GDDR3DESKTOP
Release date: 15 Jan 2009
GeForce GTX 275

Summary

Reasons to consider Radeon R6 Graphics IGP

204 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 275 .
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support.

Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 275

Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications.
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor

GeForce GTX 275

HWBench recommends GeForce GTX 275

Based on theoretical specifications.


Specifications

Core Configuration

Radeon R6 Graphics IGPGeForce GTX 275
GPU NameSpectre ()vsGT200B (G200-105-B3)
Fab Process28 nmvs55 nm
Die Size245 mm²vs470 mm²
Transistors2,410 millionvs1,400 million
Shaders384vs240
Compute Units6vs10
Core clock533 MHzvs633 MHz
ROPs8vs28
TMUs24vs80

Memory Configuration

Radeon R6 Graphics IGPGeForce GTX 275
Memory TypeSystem SharedvsGDDR3
Bus WidthSystem Sharedvs448 bit
Memory SpeedSystem Sharedvs1134 MHz
2268 MHz effective
Memory Size0 Mbvs896 Mb

Additional details

Radeon R6 Graphics IGPGeForce GTX 275
TDP15 wattsvs219 watts
Release Date17 Sep 2014vs15 Jan 2009

Raw Performance comparison

Pixel Rate

  • Radeon R6 Graphics IGP
    4.26 GP/s
  • GeForce GTX 275
    17.70 GP/s

GigaPixels - higher is better

Texel Rate

  • Radeon R6 Graphics IGP
    12.80 GT/s
  • GeForce GTX 275
    50.60 GT/s

GigaTexels - higher is better

Memory bandwidth

  • Radeon R6 Graphics IGP
    0.00 GB/s
  • GeForce GTX 275
    127.00 GB/s

GB/s - higher is better

Single precision performance

  • Radeon R6 Graphics IGP
    409.30 GFLOPs
  • GeForce GTX 275
    673.90 GFLOPs

GFLOPs - higher is better