Radeon R7 240 vs Radeon R5 340 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 240 |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R5 340 OEM |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
| Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
| Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
| Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
| Supports Mantle |
| Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R5 340 OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R7 240 | | Radeon R5 340 OEM | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Oland (Oland PRO) | vs | Oland (Oland XT) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
| Die Size | 90 mm² | vs | 90 mm² |
| Transistors | 1,040 million | vs | 1,040 million |
| Shaders | 320 | vs | 384 |
| Compute Units | 5 | vs | 6 |
| Core clock | 730 MHz | vs | 800 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 8 |
| TMUs | 20 | vs | 24 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R7 240 | | Radeon R5 340 OEM | |
|---|
| Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed | 900 MHz
1800 MHz effective | vs | 1125 MHz
4500 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R7 240 | | Radeon R5 340 OEM | |
|---|
| TDP | 30 watts | vs | 65 watts |
| Release Date | 8 Oct 2013 | vs | 5 May 2015 |
Radeon R7 240
5.84 GP/s
Radeon R5 340 OEM
6.40 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon R7 240
14.60 GT/s
Radeon R5 340 OEM
19.20 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon R7 240
28.80 GB/s
Radeon R5 340 OEM
72.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon R7 240
467.20 GFLOPs
Radeon R5 340 OEM
614.40 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better