Radeon R7 250 vs Radeon R7 250X
Summary
Radeon R7 250
100%
Radeon R7 250X
146%
Relative performance
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 250 |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 250X |
Around 46% higher average synthetic performance. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R7 250X
The Radeon R7 250X is the better performing card based on the synthetic benchmarks used (1 benchmarks).
Core Configuration
| Radeon R7 250 | | Radeon R7 250X | |
---|
GPU Name | Oland (Oland XT) | vs | Cape Verde (Cape Verde XT) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 90 mm² | vs | 123 mm² |
Transistors | 1,040 million | vs | 1,500 million |
Shaders | 384 | vs | 640 |
Compute Units | 6 | vs | 10 |
Core clock | 1000 MHz | vs | 950 MHz |
ROPs | 8 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 24 | vs | 40 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R7 250 | | Radeon R7 250X | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 1150 MHz
4600 MHz effective | vs | 1125 MHz
4500 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 1024 Mb | vs | 1024 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R7 250 | | Radeon R7 250X | |
---|
TDP | 65 watts | vs | 80 watts |
Release Date | 8 Oct 2013 | vs | 13 Feb 2014 |
Radeon R7 250
8.00 GP/s
Radeon R7 250X
15.20 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon R7 250
24.00 GT/s
Radeon R7 250X
38.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon R7 250
73.60 GB/s
Radeon R7 250X
72.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon R7 250
768.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R7 250X
1216.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better
Radeon R7 250
2740
Radeon R7 250X
4020
Points (higher is better)