Radeon R7 260X vs Radeon R9 360 OEM
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 260X |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider Radeon R9 360 OEM |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports FreeSync |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports TrueAudio |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
HWBench recommends Radeon R7 260X
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R7 260X | | Radeon R9 360 OEM | |
---|
GPU Name | Bonaire (Bonaire XTX) | vs | Tobago (Tobago PRO) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 28 nm |
Die Size | 160 mm² | vs | 160 mm² |
Transistors | 2,080 million | vs | 2,080 million |
Shaders | 896 | vs | 768 |
Compute Units | 14 | vs | 12 |
Core clock | 1100 MHz | vs | 1000 MHz |
ROPs | 16 | vs | 16 |
TMUs | 56 | vs | 48 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R7 260X | | Radeon R9 360 OEM | |
---|
Memory Type | GDDR5 | vs | GDDR5 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 128 bit |
Memory Speed | 1625 MHz
6500 MHz effective | vs | 1625 MHz
6500 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 2048 Mb | vs | 2048 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R7 260X | | Radeon R9 360 OEM | |
---|
TDP | 115 watts | vs | 85 watts |
Release Date | 8 Oct 2013 | vs | 5 May 2015 |
Radeon R7 260X
17.60 GP/s
Radeon R9 360 OEM
16.00 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon R7 260X
61.60 GT/s
Radeon R9 360 OEM
48.00 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon R7 260X
104.00 GB/s
Radeon R9 360 OEM
104.00 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon R7 260X
1971.00 GFLOPs
Radeon R9 360 OEM
1536.00 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better