Radeon R7 350X OEM vs GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 350X OEM |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Supports Direct3D 12 Async Compute |
Supports ReLive (allows game streaming/recording with minimum performance penalty) |
Supports Mantle |
Based on an outdated architecture (AMD GCN), there may be no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
Reasons to consider GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends Radeon R7 350X OEM
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R7 350X OEM | | GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 | |
---|
GPU Name | Oland (Oland XT) | vs | GT218 (GT218-200-B1) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 90 mm² | vs | 57 mm² |
Transistors | 1,040 million | vs | 260 million |
Shaders | 384 | vs | 16 |
Compute Units | 6 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 1000 MHz | vs | 589 MHz |
ROPs | 8 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 24 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R7 350X OEM | | GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 | |
---|
Memory Type | DDR3 | vs | DDR2 |
Bus Width | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | 1000 MHz
2000 MHz effective | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 4096 Mb | vs | 128 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R7 350X OEM | | GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 | |
---|
TDP | 65 watts | vs | 31 watts |
Release Date | 5 May 2015 | vs | 24 Aug 2009 |
Radeon R7 350X OEM
8.00 GP/s
GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
2.36 GP/s
GigaPixels - higher is better
Radeon R7 350X OEM
24.00 GT/s
GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
4.71 GT/s
GigaTexels - higher is better
Radeon R7 350X OEM
32.00 GB/s
GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
6.40 GB/s
GB/s - higher is better
Radeon R7 350X OEM
768.00 GFLOPs
GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
44.86 GFLOPs
GFLOPs - higher is better