Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7350B) vs GeForce GTX 260
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7350B) |
| 92 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the GeForce GTX 260 . |
| This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Reasons to consider GeForce GTX 260 |
| Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
| PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
No clear winner declared
We have no data to declare a winner at this time.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7350B) | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
|---|
| GPU Name | Spectre () | vs | GT200 (G200-100-A2) |
| Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 65 nm |
| Die Size | 245 mm² | vs | 576 mm² |
| Transistors | 2,410 million | vs | 1,400 million |
| Shaders | 384 | vs | 192 |
| Compute Units | 6 | vs | 8 |
| Core clock | 720 MHz | vs | 576 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | vs | 28 |
| TMUs | 24 | vs | 64 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7350B) | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
|---|
| Memory Type | System Shared | vs | GDDR3 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 448 bit |
| Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 999 MHz
1998 MHz effective |
| Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 896 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7350B) | | GeForce GTX 260 | |
|---|
| TDP | 90 watts | vs | 182 watts |
| Release Date | 17 Feb 2014 | vs | 16 Jun 2008 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better