Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7700K) vs GeForce 210
Summary
Reasons to consider Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7700K) |
This is a much newer product, it might have better long term support. |
Higher theoretical gaming performance, based on specifications. |
Reasons to consider GeForce 210 |
59 watts lower power draw. This might be a strong point if your current power supply is not enough to handle the Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7700K) . |
Based on an outdated architecture (Nvidia Tesla), there are no performance optimizations for current games and applications |
PhysX support, however PhysX performance on newest games may be poor |
HWBench recommends Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7700K)
Based on theoretical specifications.
Core Configuration
| Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7700K) | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
GPU Name | Spectre () | vs | GT218 (GT218-300-B1) |
Fab Process | 28 nm | vs | 40 nm |
Die Size | 245 mm² | vs | 57 mm² |
Transistors | 2,410 million | vs | 260 million |
Shaders | 384 | vs | 16 |
Compute Units | 6 | vs | 2 |
Core clock | 554 MHz | vs | 520 MHz |
ROPs | 8 | vs | 4 |
TMUs | 24 | vs | 8 |
Memory Configuration
| Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7700K) | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
Memory Type | System Shared | vs | DDR3 |
Bus Width | System Shared | vs | 64 bit |
Memory Speed | System Shared | vs | 400 MHz
800 MHz effective |
Memory Size | 0 Mb | vs | 512 Mb |
Additional details
| Radeon R7 Graphics IGP (APU A10-7700K) | | GeForce 210 | |
---|
TDP | 90 watts | vs | 31 watts |
Release Date | 17 Feb 2014 | vs | 12 Oct 2009 |
GigaPixels - higher is better
GigaTexels - higher is better
GFLOPs - higher is better